| Pages: [1] 2 |
1. Electronic Suppression Destroyers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I really like this idea. +1 from me. A few well placed disruption bubbles could change the tide of a battle, just like Interdictors do now. Off topic: I also really like the idea of a Command Destroyer that is able to provide limited boosts ...
- by Zachev Trace - at 2014.02.05 01:20:00
|
2. Active offline tanking? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Ok first of all your auto repeating modules keep running after you DC. This makes sense as it buys you time to log back in. Whether you are perma tanked or not, throwing a hissy fit and asking for all auto repeating modules to shut off upon DC is ...
- by Zachev Trace - at 2013.11.23 03:04:00
|
3. Active offline tanking? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Let me correct myself, several thousand kinetic and thermal dps (tengu's highest resists) mixed in with sig tanking. And the problem isn't with the perma run active tanks, it's with AI running ASBs or X-L boosters while you are swapping accounts. ...
- by Zachev Trace - at 2013.11.23 01:35:00
|
4. Active offline tanking? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I only fly cap stable ships for exactly this reason, my #1 choice for DED sites is a tengu. Put a bill into it and you can tank several thousand dps while running an AB, on top of having 4 BCSs. Running HAMS you hit just over 1k dps @40k. (With im...
- by Zachev Trace - at 2013.11.23 00:57:00
|
5. Active offline tanking? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
If you have a permanent running tank, the tank keeps running if you disconnect. Until of course your ship manages to warp off and cloak up after your aggression timer expires.
- by Zachev Trace - at 2013.11.23 00:26:00
|
6. An ever-changing New Eden? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I like the idea of the universe changing over time. The changing of security status has to be my favorite part of what you were talking about. Seeing some of low/high sec fluctuate between high and low over months would be pretty cool. And maybe ...
- by Zachev Trace - at 2013.10.25 23:58:00
|
7. t2 Logi Frigs - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
+1 The only time I've actually seen frig logi's used is small gangs in low sec and harpy fleets. (With a single burst repping a harpy, it can tank 750 dps kinetic/thermal wise.) It would be cool, but needs to be balanced. T1 logi ships get the ...
- by Zachev Trace - at 2013.10.25 20:25:00
|
8. Naga Missile-Based Attack Battlecruiser - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I honestly really like the idea of a tier 3 BC that uses missiles, especially with the addition of RHMLs. +1
- by Zachev Trace - at 2013.10.25 02:17:00
|
9. Showing Logistics(remote reps) on killmails for the offending party - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
+1 to logi on killmails. Can't tell you how many kills I've missed out on because of the lack of logi being recorded.
- by Zachev Trace - at 2013.10.14 04:35:00
|
10. "Light" Command Ships - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
+1 More t2 destroyers :D I've always wanted this actually, just never got around to posting about it. Love the idea of a command destroyer, especially when their only other counter parts are already a major part of fleets (interdictors). This...
- by Zachev Trace - at 2013.10.14 00:55:00
|
11. Riding Shotgun??? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I honestly say +1 to this idea. I like the idea of smaller fleets being able to be jumped around by a much less expensive manor of capital transport when compared to Titans. Don't get me wrong, I love the ability to drop hundreds of ships instant...
- by Zachev Trace - at 2013.10.14 00:35:00
|
12. Dual-Character Training Counter - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
+1 Managing plex on 7 characters is a pain in the ass, especially when you don't remeber how much plex is already on one. CCP Please implement this :D.
- by Zachev Trace - at 2013.10.13 00:03:00
|
13. Still want name changes and the freeing up of old names! - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Yea I don't want the wiping of assets EVER, except on trial accounts. I am in full support of deleting old trial accounts WITH a notification sent to that owner 2 weeks in advance that forces them to either petition against it or resub to EVE to k...
- by Zachev Trace - at 2013.10.07 00:14:00
|
14. Still want name changes and the freeing up of old names! - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
+1 for getting rid of old names as well as name changes. Not that those characters should be removed from the game, just that they should be required to come up with a new name should they return to the game after all those years. Notifications...
- by Zachev Trace - at 2013.10.06 23:35:00
|
15. Null capital systems - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
1 Capital per region limit then? And maybe only if the entirety of the SOV is owned by that alliance? I do agree about the possibility of it being exploited by every system being a capital run by a different alliance. But at the same time, how muc...
- by Zachev Trace - at 2013.10.05 23:20:00
|
16. [REQUEST] Fix Drone Damage Calculation in the Fitting Window - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
It doesn't change because your highest DPS drones are your Gardes. And when you launch them, suddenly something else is highest DPS in your bay, and thus, the DPS drops. It's not a glitch, its a feature.
- by Zachev Trace - at 2013.10.05 23:14:00
|
17. Missile Acceleration Mechanics - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
This is the main reason why heavies and cruise missiles are still not used in major fleet fights. They have the damage, but by the time it takes to get to the target to take advantage of their alpha (or at least the cruise's alpha). The target has...
- by Zachev Trace - at 2013.10.05 01:38:00
|
18. A Point Like No Other - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Yea I feel the same way to be honest. Communication should be a major part of fleet engagements, but at the same time I feel that a little indicator on whether the ship is pointed by someone else wouldn't hurt too bad.
- by Zachev Trace - at 2013.10.04 19:49:00
|
19. Allow Players to Rejoin Their Starter Corps - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
You are correct, I had to log in to double check, never noticed that actually. I've never had regrets about leaving my npc corp, as ones run by players have always been more fun. Not to mention the freebies you get as a newer player XD. But yea, ...
- by Zachev Trace - at 2013.10.04 05:57:00
|
20. Allow Players to Rejoin Their Starter Corps - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Correct me if I'm wrong but if you want to go back to the NPC corp you were in, why not just quit your current player corporation. It will automatically put you back into that npc corp.
- by Zachev Trace - at 2013.10.04 05:15:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |